BETMECH1DJohnCarloLa
5 views
14 slides
Oct 22, 2025
Slide 1 of 14
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
About This Presentation
to help student in the field of technology
Size: 200.67 KB
Language: en
Added: Oct 22, 2025
Slides: 14 pages
Slide Content
“moral
responsibility’’
LAURENCE PASTRANA
Moral responsibility
Defines the extent to which a person deserves blame
or punishment, praise or word, or should pay
compensation for having done something wrong or
having wrongfully harmed someone. It assumes that
the person performing an act is personally
accountable for the act. As such, moral responsibility
concerns only the moral acts, or those which man
performs knowingly and freely. Since it determines
whether a person, as a doer of an act ,deserves
reward or punishment, moral responsibility
necessarily involves the notion of guilt or innocence.
Two determinant of moral
responsibility
1.LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY is based on penal laws
or legal standards strictly enforced by the State.
Legal responsibility involves definite sanction such
as fines,imprisonment,and even death.
There are legal obligation for
most small business.
1.Business structure and registrations.
2.Licensing
3.Selling goods and services.
4.Contract
5.Leasing premises
6.Employing staff
7.Occupational health and safety
8.Privacy and information protection
9.intellectual property
Moral responsibility (OR MORAL LIABILITY)
of a person is usually determined based on ethical
or moral standards.Ifa person acts in violation of a
particular standards of morality,heis said to be
morally responsible for the conequencesof his
IMMORAL act.
Example of moral responsibility in
the workplace:
1.Safe and healtyworkplace
2.Promt payment of employees
3.Treatment of co-workers
4.Fair treatment of customer.
:
Determinants of moral responsibility
For the person to be held morally responsible for
his act-it is important that his act be deliberate or
voluntary.Theact must be KNOWING and FREE.If
a person fully knows and fully intends his
acts,thenthe act is perfectly voluntary;hence, he
is absulutelyresponsible for the act and its
consequences.Butwithout knowledge and
freedom,orin the absence of any of this two
attributes,theact becomes less voluntary and the
moral responsibility of the doer becomes less.
It is thus important to take note that a person
is morally responsible only for his act and its
foreseen injurious effects,inwhich he has:
1.Knowledge of relevant facts and the moral wrongfulness
of the act,and
2.freedom in performing the act,whichinclude ability
.
Actions with unintended results
It is clear that a person is morally respoandnsible
for actions which he performs DELIBERATELY and
their PERCEIVED consequences.Butis he also
morally responsible for the result he did not directly
intend?
PAUL GLENN(1941) asserts that a doer is
morally responsible for the unintended result
of his act ONLY when
1.he is able to foresee the evil result or effect,atleast,in
a general way.
2.he is free to refrain from doing that which would
produce the foreseen evil.
3.the doer has moral obligation not to do that which
produces an evil effect.
Double-effects
Directly related to actions with unintended
results are actions with double-effects.In
cases where the act performed has produced
two different consequences or results,one
good(intended) and the other
evil(unintended),it is unclear whether the doer
is morally liable for the evil result of his action.
ALFREDO PANIZO(1964) cites the following
principles to determine the moral responsiblityof
persons whose act produce double-effects.
1.The action which produce double-effects must be
good in itself,or,atleastmorally indifferenint.
2.The good effect must not come from the evil
effect.Todo evil in order to achieve something
good is not justified.
3.The motive of the doer must be towards the
attainment of the good .The evil is permitted only
as an incidental result.
4.The good effect must outweigh the evil result in its
importance