Such resistance is ironic. Efforts to build a comprehensive child protection
system potentially liberate service providers from inherently unrealistic
expectations. Moreover, the values and strategies that Lonne et al. and other
reformers are attempting to bring to the forefront are those that historically
have been associated with social work. In short, the approach that is being
advocated is one that supports the best traditions of the profession.
Fourth, even if one perceives the changes that Lonne et al. advocate as
somehow radical, they are achievable.As Lonne et al. note, the greatest
achievement of the child protection system in the second half of the twentieth
century was that “it is now an exception rather than a rule to have adults
who do not recognize the significance and scope of child abuse and neglect,
and who support the obligation of the broad community to intervene to pro-
tect vulnerable children.” Building from this concern, it is time to use the
collective sense of responsibility to build or strengthen universal systems of
support for families.
I am currently leading Strong Communities for Children, a long-term,
foundation-sponsored initiative to implement the US Advisory Board’s
(1993b) vision in parts of two counties in northwestern South Carolina (see
Melton and Holaday, 2008). In an ethnically diverse, mixed-social-class area
with rural, small-town, suburban, and urban communities (approximately
125,000 people, according to the 2000 census), we have sought to prevent child
maltreatment by strengthening the ties among neighbors. Specifically, we have
sought to assure that “no families are left outside,” indeed that all children and
parents in our service area will know that whenever they have reason to
celebrate, worry, or grieve, someone will notice, and someone will care.
To do so, we have relied on hundreds of community organizations, especi-
ally those in primary institutions (religious organizations, fire departments,
community police officers, primary health clinics, civic clubs, and others) that
are rarely perceived as key elements of child protection. In this context, in less
than 6 years, we have engaged almost 5,000 volunteers who have contributed
more than 50,000 hours (a conservative estimate). Moreover, we have been
most successful in the least advantaged communities.
In an era of alienation and isolation, we have shown that it is still feasible
to bring people together to weave safety nets for children and their families.
I mention Strong Communities, because we have generated such support in
an area that is among the most conservative in the United States, both poli-
tically and theologically. Upstate South Carolina would not be predicted by
most observers to be fertile ground for an initiative to enhance child welfare,
even if primarily through informal support in the community. Nonetheless,
the desire to “Keep Kids Safe”—to ensure the security of the smallest mem-
bers of the community—transcends ideology; moreover, it overpowers the
social differences that often divide communities.
As I write this foreword in January 2008, I am watching television coverage
of the results of the South Carolina Democratic primary, an election won with
a landslide by Barack Obama. In both parties, the theme of the current election
1111
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1011
1
2
3111
4
5
6
7
8
9
20111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
30111
1
2
3
4
35
6
7
8
9
40111
1
2
3
4
45111
Forewordxiii