rona-intervention-reading grade 6 aeal program.docx

AsicoKristineJoy 3 views 3 slides Aug 29, 2025
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 3
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3

About This Presentation

grade 6 intervention plan


Slide Content

Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
MIMAROPA REGION
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF CALAPAN CITY
SAN ANTONIO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Address: San Antonio, Calapan City
Contact No.: 09683944349
Email Address: [email protected]
INTERVENTION PLAN FOR THE ASSESSMENT RESULTS OF PHIL IRI
SY 2025-2026
Grade 5-Mapagmahal
OBJECTIVES:
1.Increase phonemic awareness, word decoding, and high-frequency word recognition skills. (edit this)
NAME OF LEARNERS
STATUS
After one week After 2 weeks
Grade 2 Level
A.Frustration
1.Casupanan, Jhon Khrics, Evora
2.Cruzat, Mark Jouparcel, Garcia
3.Tirona, John Ezekiel, San Jose
4.Mayo, Jasmine Mae
5.Rayos, Maxine May, Ibañez
B.Instructional
1.Manalo, Dwayne Ismael, Banaag
2.Manalo, Lew Marco, Mejico
3.Reyes, Prince Zyrus, Abas
Reading Level Intervention/Remediation Time Frame Materials Needed Person(s) Success Indicator
SAES/RTL/PHILIRIINTERVENTIONPLAN/07112025

Activities Involved
Grade 2 –
Frustration
Phonics & Letter Sound
Recognition
July 14-18,
2025
Alphabet chart,
Magnetic letters,
Phonics song
(English &
Filipino)
Teacher 5 out of 5 pupils can identify
and produce correct letter
sounds (including short
vowels, blends, and digraphs)
with 80–90% accuracy in
guided activities
Word Decoding Practice July 21-25 and
28-31, 2025
Word building
cards, Pantig
cards (Filipino)
5 out of 5 pupils can decode
and read CVC words and
words with consonant blends
and digraphs with 75–85%
accuracy, showing improved
confidence in sounding out
unfamiliar words
Guided or Repetitive
Reading
Aug. 4-8, 2025Short stories with
repeated
structures,
Flashcards with
high-frequency
words
5 out of 5 pupils can read
sentence passages with fewer
miscues and demonstrate
75–80% literal
comprehension based on
teacher questioning and
follow-up discussion
Word Comprehension and
Correction
Aug. 11-15,
2025
Comprehension
Question Cards
(Literal)
5 out of 5 pupils can
recognize and correct
misread or misunderstood
words during oral reading
and achieve 75–80% word
meaning accuracy using
context clues and visual aids

Reading Level
Intervention/Remediation
Activities
Time Frame Materials Needed
Person(s)
Involved
Success Indicator
Grade 2 –
Instructional
Targeted Word Recognition
Practice
a.Phonics drills (focus on
specific patterns the
student misreads: CVC,
blends, digraphs)
b.Elkonin boxes
c.Quick word sorts
July 14-18,
2025
Magnetic letters/
letter tiles, Word
family charts,
Flashcards
Teacher 3 out of 3 pupils can
accurately recognize and
read target words (CVC,
blends, digraphs) in isolation
and in context with 80–90%
accuracy, showing fewer
instances of
mispronunciation or
substitution
Guided Reading July 21-25,
2025
July 28 to
Aug. 1, 2025
Leveled decodable
books or story
cards, Finger
pointers or
tracking tools
3 out of 3 pupils can read
leveled passages with fewer
miscues and demonstrate
75–80% literal
comprehension based on oral
questioning and retelling.
Scaffolded Comprehension
Support
August 4-8,
11-15, 2025
WH-question
cards, Visual
graphic
organizers,
Comprehension
sentence frames
3 out of 3 pupils can answer
3 out of 4 teacher-guided
comprehension questions
(literal and inferential) with
appropriate prompts,
achieving 75–80%
understanding of the text
Prepared by: Checked by: Approved:
RONALYN T. LAYGO REYNALYN M. ADAME LORRAINE F. SANGALANG
Teacher III Master Teacher I Principal II
Tags