Rubrics ppt

92,297 views 43 slides Mar 22, 2013
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 43
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43

About This Presentation

The PPT explains the importance of Rubrics in teaching. Some examples of Rubrics in Mathematics also included - M.SRINIVASAN, FACULTY, ZIET, MUMBAI


Slide Content

PRESENTED BY
M.SRINIVASAN
PGT(MATHS), ZIET, MUMBAI

ARubricisascoringtoolthatliststhe
criteriaor'whatcounts’forapieceofwork
Arubricisanevaluationtoolthatdescribes
qualityofworkonagamut(range)from
excellenttopoor.
Specificcharacteristicsofperformancearedetailed
forallqualitylevels.
ARubricmeasuresstudentworkagainstreal-life
criteriaandisreferredtoasaformofauthentic
assessment.

RUBRICisaguidelisting
specificcriteriaforgradingor
scoringacademicpapers,
projects,ortests
Ascoringrubricisanattemptto
communicateexpectationsof
qualityaroundatask

FOCUS ON MEASURING A STATED OBJECTIVE
(PERFORMANCE, BEHAVIOR, OR QUALITY)
USE A RANGE TO RATE PERFORMANCE
CONTAINSPECIFICPERFORMANCE
CHARACTERISTICSARRANGED IN
LEVELSINDICATINGTHEDEGREETO
WHICHSTANDARDHASBEENMET

ARUBRICINCLUDESLEVELSOFPOTENTIAL
ACHIEVEMENTFOREACHCRITERION,ANDWORK
ORPERFORMANCESAMPLESTHATTYPIFYEACH
OFTHOSELEVELS
LEVELSOFACHIEVEMENTAREOFTENGIVEN
NUMERICALSCORES
ASUMMARYSCOREFORTHEWORKBEING
ASSESSEDMAYBEPRODUCEDBYADDINGTHE
SCORESFOREACHCRITERION.
THERUBRICMAYALSOINCLUDESPACEFORTHE
JUDGETODESCRIBE THEREASONS FOREACH
JUDGMENT ORTOMAKESUGGESTIONS

•Identifyalearninggoal
•Chooseoutcomesthatmaybemeasured
witharubric
•Developoradopt(andadapt)anexisting
rubric
•Shareitwithstudents
•Assess/Grade
•Analyzeandreportresults

•Needs Improvement...Satisfactory...Good...Exemplary
•Beginning...Developing...Accomplished...Exemplary
•Needs work...Good...Excellent
•Novice...Apprentice...Proficient...Distinguished
•Numeric scale ranging from 1 to 5, for example

DESCRIBESLEVELSOFPERFORMANCEFOREACH
CRITERIONTOASSESSSTUDENTPERFORMANCEON
EACHOFTHEM.
Analyticalrubricsaredesignedtoassess
students'workbasedonspecifiedcriteriaand
differentdegreesofqualityoftheassignment.
Analyticrubricsaremorecommonbecauseteachers
typicallywanttoassesseachcriterion
separately,particularlyforassignmentsthatinvolve
alargernumberofcriteria

Ananalyticrubricresemblesagridwiththecriteria
forastudentproductlistedintheleftmostcolumn
andwithlevelsofperformancelistedacrossthetop
rowoftenusingnumbersand/ordescriptivetags
Thecellswithinthecenteroftherubricmaybe
leftblankormaycontaindescriptionsofwhatthe
specifiedcriterialooklikeforeachlevelof
performance
Whenscoringwithananalyticrubriceachof
thecriteriaisscoredindividually

ADVANTAGES
Provideusefulfeedbackonareasofstrengthand
weakness.
Criterioncanbeweightedtoreflecttherelative
importanceofeachdimension.
DISADVANTAGES
Takesmoretimetocreateandusethana
holisticrubric.
Unlesseachpointforeachcriterioniswell-
definedratersmaynotarriveatthesamescore.

ASSIGNSALEVELOFPERFORMANCEBY
ASSESSINGPERFORMANCE ACROSS
MULTIPLECRITERIAASAWHOLE.
DOESNOTLISTSEPARATELEVELSOF
PERFORMANCEFOREACHCRITERION.
HOLISTICRUBRICSTENDTOBEUSED
WHENAQUICKORGROSSJUDGMENT
NEEDSTOBEMADE

Aholisticrubricconsistsofasinglescalewithall
criteriatobeincludedintheevaluationbeing
consideredtogether(e.g.,clarity,organization,and
mechanics).
Withaholisticrubrictheraterassignsasingle
score(usuallyona1to4or1to6pointscale)
basedonanoveralljudgmentofthestudent
work.
Theratermatchesanentirepieceofstudentwork
toasingledescriptiononthescale.

ADVANTAGES
Emphasisonwhatthelearnerisableto
demonstrate,ratherthanwhathe/shecannotdo.
Savestimebyminimizingthenumberofdecisionsraters
make.
Canbeappliedconsistentlybytrainedratersincreasing
reliability.
DISADVANTAGES
Doesnotprovidespecificfeedbackforimprovement.
Whenstudentworkisatvaryinglevelsspanningthe
criteriapointsitcanbedifficulttoselectthesinglebest
description.
Criteriacannotbeweighted.

FOR TEACHERS FOR STUDENTS
Allowevaluationandassessmentto
bemoreobjectiveandconsistent
Helpthemdefine"quality“
Helpfocustoclarifyhis/hercriteriain
specificterms
Promotestudentawarenessofabout
thecriteriatouseinassessingpeer
performance
Provideusefulfeedbackregardingthe
effectivenessoftheinstruction
Helpstudentsjudgeandrevisetheir
ownworkbeforehandingintheir
assignments
Providebenchmarksagainstwhichto
measureanddocumentprogress
Clearlyshowthestudenthowtheir
workwillbeevaluatedandwhatis
expected