rubrik-in-making-case-study-living-it.pdf

this is a rubriks in making a case study

1. Template: https://writeonline.ca/casestudy.php?content=section6Case Study on Digital Payment System Project RubricCriteriaExcellent (5 points)Good (4 points)Satisfactory (3 points)Needs Improvement (2 points)Unsatisfactory (1 point)Score
Understanding of TopicDemonstrates a thorough understanding of the digital payment system, its features, and its market impact.
Shows a good understanding of the system but with minor gaps in detail.Provides a basic understanding with some inaccuracies or omissions.Displays limited understanding with significant inaccuracies.Lacks understanding of the digital payment system and its relevance.
Research DepthComprehensive research with a wide range of sources including current data and expert opinions.
Good research with relevant sources but may lack some depth or recent data.Adequate research but with limited sources or outdated information.Minimal research with few sources or lacking relevance.Inadequate research with little to no relevant sources.
Analysis and InsightProvides in-depth analysis and insightful observations on the system’s impact on users and businesses.
Offers a solid analysis with useful insights but may lack depth in some areas.Analysis is basic with limited insight into the impact of the system.Analysis is superficial with minimal insight or understanding of impact.Lacks meaningful analysis and insight into the system’s impact.Clarity and OrganizationWell-organized, clear, and logical presentation with a coherent structure Generally well-organized with clear presentation, though some Organization is adequate but may lack clarity or have some structural Poor organization and unclear presentation affecting readability.Disorganized and unclear, making it difficult to follow the case study.

2. and flow of information.sections may be slightly disorganized.issues.
Use of EvidenceEffectively uses evidence to support claims, including data, examples, and case studies.Uses evidence well but may have some gaps in supporting claims or less relevant examples.Some evidence is used but with limited support for claims or less relevant examples.Minimal use of evidence or poorly chosen examples that do not strongly support claims.Little to no evidence used to support claims, with weak or irrelevant examples.
Critical ThinkingDemonstrates exceptional critical thinking and the ability to evaluate the system from multiple perspectives.
Shows good critical thinking with evaluation from several perspectives.Basic critical thinking with limited evaluation of different perspectives.Limited critical thinking with a narrow view of the system’s impact.Lacks critical thinking with little to no evaluation of different perspectives.
RecommendationsProvides well-founded, practical recommendations supported by analysis and evidence.
Offers practical recommendations with some support from analysis and evidence.Recommendations are provided but may lack strong support or practicality.Recommendations are weak or not well-supported by analysis.Recommendations are missing, impractical, or not supported by evidence.
PresentationProfessional and polished presentation with attention to detail in formatting and visuals.
Generally professional presentation with minor issues in formatting or visuals.
Adequate presentation with some issues in formatting or visuals.Unprofessional presentation with significant formatting or visual issues.Poor presentation with major formatting and visual issues.Total Points: _____ / 40