S4 - Process/product optimization using design of experiments and response surface methodology - Session 4/4

2,236 views 21 slides Dec 10, 2014
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 21
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21

About This Presentation

Session 3 – Central composite designs, second order models, ANOVA, blocking, qualitative factors

An intensive practical course mainly for PhD-students on the use of designs of experiments (DOE) and response surface methodology (RSM) for optimization problems. The course covers relevant background...


Slide Content

Process/product optimization
using design of experiments and
response surface methodology Mikko Mäkelä
Sveriges landbruksuniversitet
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Department of Forest Biomaterials and Technology
Division of Biomass Technology and Chemistry
Umeå, Sweden

Contents Practical course, arranged in 4 individual sessions:
Session 1 –Introduction, factorial design, first order models
Session 2 –Matlab exercise: factorial design
Session 3 – Central composite designs, second order models, ANOVA,
blocking, qualitative factors
Session 4 –Matlab exercise: practical optimization example on given
data

Session 1 Introduction
Why experimental design
Factorial design
Design matrix
Model equation = coefficients
Residual
Response contour

Session 2 Factorial design
Research problem
Design matrix
Model equation = coefficients
Degrees of freedom
Predicted response
Residual
ANOVA
R
2
Response contour

Session 3 Central composite designs
Design variance
Common designs
Second order models
Stationary points
ANOVA
Blocking
Confounding
Qualitative factors

Session 4 Uncontrolled factors
Factor coding
Realized vs. planned
Response transformation
Coefficients
Observed vs. predicted
Residuals
ANOVA
Contour
Estimated prediction variance
Confidence interval

Research problem A cuboidal (α=1, n
c
=3) central composite design to
study the effect of three factors on a response
Inlet air temperature, T: 0-90 °C
Slit height, S: 70-150 mm
Sludge feeding, F: 275-775 kg/h
Ambient RH(%) included as an uncontrolled
factor
Cuboidal design
α= 1

Research problem

Research problem Factor coding?
Uncontrolled factors?

Research problem
N:o T S F RH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

Research problem

Research problem

Research problem

Research problem

Research problem
Parameter df
Sum of
squares (SS)
Mean
square (MS)
F-value p-value
Total corrected
Regression
Residual
Lack of fit
Pure error

Research problem

Research problem U?L>
?
E
?


E ′?? where

?
L
T
5
T
6
?T
?
,

L
>
5
>
6⋮
> ?
and ?
?
L
>
55
>
56
/2 ⋯ >
5?
/2
>
66
?>
6?
/2
⋱⋮
sym. >
??

!??
!?
/
L
!:
,
>
-
?
-
>
.
?
.
>
/
?
/
>
0
?
0
>
//
?
/
.
!?
/
L0
→ T
7
L
?
/
6
//

Research problem

Session 4 Uncontrolled factors
Factor coding
Realized vs. planned
Response transformation
Coefficients
Observed vs. predicted
Residuals
ANOVA
Contour
Estimated prediction variance
Confidence interval

Howtocontinue? Literature Myers RH, Montgomery DC, Anderson-Cook CM, Response Surface Methodology,
Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, 3rd ed., John Wiley &
Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, 2009 (recommended)
Eriksson L, Johansson E, Kettaneh-Wold N, Wikström C, Wold S, Design of
Experiments, Principles and Applications , 3rd ed., Umetrics, Umeå,2008 (useful for
beginners) Software Matlab (The MathWorks, Inc.), Modde (Umetrics), Design Expert® (Stat-Ease, Inc.),
JMP (SAS Institute Inc.), Minitab (Minitab Inc.)

Thankyoufor participating! You can contact me via
E-mail ([email protected])
ResearchGate (https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mikko_Maekelae) LinkedIn (https://www.linkedin.com/in/mikkomaekelae)