Structuring Lesson Plans with Goals and Success Criteria

bpotter6 10 views 10 slides Oct 29, 2025
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 10
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10

About This Presentation

Lesson planning effectiveness increases when built around clear learning goals and defined measures of success. A learning goal specifies what students should know or do by the end of a lesson, while success criteria describe the exact evidence that determines if students reached a goal.


Slide Content

Structuring
Lesson Plans
with Goals and
Success Criteria
Bruce Potter

The Foundation of Effective Planning
Lesson planning effectiveness increases when built around clear learning goals and defined measures of
success. A learning goal specifies what students should know or do by the end of a lesson, while success
criteria describe the exact evidence that determines if students reached a goal.
Together, they turn planning from a sequence of activities into a framework where both teacher and student
can see the intended outcome.

Standards-Based Planning in Practice
Schools often rely on standards-based planning templates to keep
these elements consistent. Teachers write learning targets in
student-friendly language and link them directly to curriculum
benchmarks.
A math lesson might set the objective of calculating the area of a
triangle, while a history lesson might require explaining the causes
of a major event.
Success criteria outline the proof of learning4solving problems
correctly or producing a written explanation with required details.
Recording both targets and criteria makes expectations concrete
and measurable.

Embedding Expectations Throughout the Lesson
Introduction
Teachers introduce these expectations at
the start of a lesson
During Activities
Revisit them during activities
Closing
Bring them back in closing discussions
Daily teachings must embed these elements. Making them visible throughout the lesson ensures students
consistently know the target, not just at the beginning or end. By carrying them through each stage, these
expectations and criteria become steady reference points rather than static notes in a plan.

Formative Checks Confirm Progress
Formative checks confirm whether students are making progress toward those
targets. Exit tickets, peer reviews, or short quizzes provide quick understanding
signals.
Real-Time Adjustments
The results allow teachers to
adjust pacing, reteach concepts,
or extend practice
Immediate Feedback
Students get immediate feedback
on where they stand
Connected Planning
Short progress checks connect lesson planning to real-time instructional
choices

Coordinating Practices Across Schools
Beyond individual classrooms, schools coordinate these practices to maintain consistency. Teacher planning
groups and professional learning communities (PLCs4structured teacher collaboration groups) use shared
templates and schoolwide planning tools to align targets and criteria.
The alignment standardizes expectations and improves grading, since educators can report results regarding
specific skills mastered rather than general scores. Families gain a clearer picture of what learning has
occurred.

Documentation as a
Tool for Growth
Documentation strengthens this system by creating a
usable record for teachers and leaders. Lesson plans
and student work linked to defined targets and
criteria provide evidence for coaching sessions and
review meetings.
When administrators study these records and offer
feedback, documentation becomes a tool for
instructional consistency instead of a compliance
formality.

Overcoming Implementation Barriers
Barriers still exist. Teachers may have limited planning time, uneven training in writing precise criteria, or multiple curriculum demands that
compete for attention.
Streamlined Templates
Simplified planning formats that reduce
complexity
Digital Planning Tools
Technology solutions that make the
process manageable
Focused Coaching
Targeted support to keep instructional
quality high
Schools that overcome these challenges use streamlined templates, digital planning tools, and focused coaching to make the process
manageable while keeping instructional quality high.

Building Sustainability into Long-Term Routines
Sustainability depends on building clarity into long-term routines. PLC reviews, collaborative planning cycles,
and annual protocols ensure targets and criteria remain central even when staff or initiatives change.
Leaders can reinforce sustainability by aligning professional development with these routines to renew clarity practices annually.
By embedding the practice into regular operations, schools protect it from fading after initial training and
establish predictable expectations that endure.

A Framework for Lasting Improvement
Structuring lessons with learning goals and success criteria creates transparent, measurable, and adaptable
instruction. From daily checks that confirm progress to long-term routines that sustain consistency, this
approach links classroom teaching, assessment, and leadership review.
Students clearly understand what success looks like, and teachers gain a scalable framework across
classrooms for lasting improvement.