teacher evaluation

teacher evaluation

1. PURPOSES 1.To measure competence of teachers. 2.To foster professional growth and development. 3. To improve student teacher relationship. 4. Utilize technological development. 5. Find out own limitations and deficiency.

2. EVALUATOR?? WHO WILL EVALUATE??

3. CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION - Evaluative tool/instrument should be measurable. -Should relate to important teaching skill. -Be as objective as possible. -Should be clearly communicated to the teacher before the evaluation. -Should be linked to the teacher’s professional growth .

4. - A pre conference and post conference should be held. -All observations should be documented, reviewed and signed by the evaluator and the teacher. -Teacher should be provide opportunity to place written comments on the evaluation form.

5. TEACHING EVALUATION MODEL Polifroni Ec (2008) suggested this model.Teaching and teaching strategy is done by: STUDENTS 2-3 TIMES /COURSE PEERS 2 TIMES BY 2 PEERS PER COURSE SELF CREATED PORTFOLIO EACH TIME CLASS TAUGHT ADMINISTRATORS-END OF SEMESTER OR YEAR AND MORE OFTEN AS NEEDED

6. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROCESS The process of performance appraisal include ASSES INSTITUTIONAL AND PERSONAL NEEDS AND SET GOALS DEVELOP POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL ESTABLISH PERFORMANCE STANDARDS,OBJECTIVES AND TIME FRAME COMMUNICATE THESE STANDARDS TO THE EMPLOYEES ASSES THE PERFORMANCE

7. Contd … COMPARE THE ACTUAL WITH THE STANDARDS DISCUSS THE RESULTS PERIODICALLY INITIATE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS WHEN NECESSARY EVALUATE THE PERFORMANCE

8. TOOLS FOR PERFORMANCE APPRAIASAL FREE RESPONSE REPORTS RANKING PERFORMANCE CHECK LIST RATING SCALE NUMERICAL RATING SCALE LETTERED RATING SCALE GRAPHIC RATING SCALE DESCRIPTIVE RATING RATING SCALE FORCED CHOICE WRITING BEHAVIOURALLY ANCHORED RATING SCALE

9. EVALUATION METHODS 1.OBSERVATION OF CLASSROOM ACTIVITIES. 2.REVIEW OF LESSON PLANS AND CLASS ROOM RECORDS 3.SELF MONITERING ADVANTAGES: DISADVANTAGES 4. AUDIO TAPE AND VIDEO TAPE RECORDING: ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES 5.INFORMATION FROM STUDENTS: QUESTIONNAIRES INTERVIEW

10. 3.STUDENT’S TEST RESULTS 4.OUTSIDE OBSERVERS

11. 3. SELF EVALUATION: OBJECTIVES 1.SKILL NECESSARY TO TEACH EFFECTIVELY 2.ABILITY TO RECOGNIZE THE WEAK POINTS IN TEACHING. 3.ABILITY TO EXAMINE ONES OWN TECHNIQUE OF TEACHING CRITICALLY. 4.SKILL NECESSARY FOR ADEQUATE EMOTIONAL PREPARATION TO EVALUATE SELF TEACHING WITHOUT HURTING PERSONAL FEELINGS. 5.CAPACITY TO ADJUST IN SUCH A WAY THAT THE PERSON DOING SELF EVALUATION WOULD BE ABLE TO SOLVE HIS/HER OWN PROBLEMS THAT ARE THE OBSTACLES IN THE WAY OF HIS/HER TEACHING.

12. 6.CAPACITY TO ANALYZE RELATIVELY COMPLEX PROBLEMS IN TEACHING TECHNIQUES WITH THE ABILITY TO RECOGNIZE AND INITIATE SOLUTION TO THE PROBLEM. 7.ABILITY TO EVALUATE SELF AND COMPARE IT WITH THE OTHER PERSONS EVALUATION DONE ON HIM/HER AT THE SAME TIME.

13. TECHNIQUE OF SELF EVALUATION FIRST METHOD 1.THE TEACHER IS ASKED TO GIVE A LECTURE ON A GIVEN SUBJECT 2.A SUPERVISOR SITS IN THE CLASS AND LISTEN TO THE LECTURE AND MAKES RUNNING NOTES ON WHAT IS HAPPENING IN THE CLASS AND THEN REPORTS HIS/HER OBSERVATIONS. 3.AFTER THE LECTURE IS OVER THE TEACHER IS ASKED TO WRITE NOTES ON HIS/HER LECTURE. 4.THEN THE SUPERVISOR AND THE TEACHER COMPARE THEIR OBSERVATION AND DISCUSS ON GOOD AND BAD POINT.

14. SECOND METHOD 1.THE EVALUATION FORM IS GIVEN TO BOTH THE TEACHER AND SUPERVISOR. 2.THE TEACHER IS ASKED TO GIVE LECTURE ON A GIVEN SUBJECT 3.THE SUPERVISOR SITS IN THE CLASS DURING LECTURE AND COMPLETES EVALUATION FORMS ACCORDING TO INSTRUCTIONS 4.THE TEACHER FILLS HIS/HER EVALUATION FORM AFTER FINISHING THE LECTURE. 5.BOTH THE EVALUATION FORMS AFTER COMPLETIONS ARE COMPARED AND POINTS DISCUSSED. 6.THE TEACHER TRIES TO UNDERSTAND HIS/HER MISTAKES AND CORRECT THEM AND IMPROVE HIS/HER TEACHING TECHNIQUES

15. PEER REVIEW ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES GOALS OF PEER EVALUATION 1.ACCOUNTABILITY 2.ASSESMENT

16. GUIDING PRINCIPLES OF PEER EVALUATION 1-THERE MUST BE ACCEPTANCE OF TEACHER EVALUATION WITHIN THE COLLEGE AS AN INTEGRAL PART OF EDUCATIONAL PROCESS 2-IN THE PROCESS OF EVALUATION,TEACHER DEVELOPMENT WILL OCCUR ONLY IF A CONSTRUCTIVE APPROACH IS FOLLOWED 3-COLLABORATION AND MUTUAL RESPECT BETWEEN TEACHER AND EVALUATOR ARE ESSENTIAL 4-GENERAL AGREEMENT AMONG CONCERNED PARTIES ABOUT THE COLLEGE MISSION AND JOB ASSIGNMENTS MUST PRECEDE IMPLEMENTATION OF A PLAN OF TEACHER EVALUATION 5-TEACHER SELF APPRAISAL MUST BECOME A SIGNIFICANT PART OF THE PROCESS

17. REPORTING THE RESULT OF EVALUATION -DELIVER FEEDBACK IN APPOSITIVE AND CONSIDERATE WAY. - OFFER IDEAS AND SUGGEST CHANGE THAT IS BENEFICIAL TO THE TEACHER. - BE FORMAL WHILE GIVING FEEDBACK. - MAINTAIN BALANCE BETWEEN PRAISE AND CRITICISM. - GIVE ENOUGH FEEDBACK TO BE USEFUL BUT NOT TOO MUCH TO BE OVER WHELMED.