4
THE COMMUNICATIVE SYLLABUS
1.1.2 Sociolinguistics
The American sociolinguist Dell Hymes provided researchers into the
functional-notional syllabus with the concept of
communicative competence. In
transformational-generative grammar, sentences were said to be grammatical
with regard to competence and acceptable with regard to performance; but
Hymes (1972b) maintained that a sentence must also be
appropriate in relation
to the context in which it is used, and that speakers of a language have
communicative competence - a knowledge of appropriacy -just as they have
(linguistic) competence - a knowledge of grammar. Appropriacy to context is
related to a number of situational factors, summed up by Hymes (1972a) by
the acronym SPEAKING: setting, participants, ends (aims and results of the
communication), acts (the form and sequence of the message), key (the
manner of delivery), instrumentalities (the channel of communication), norms
(conduct of the participants) and genre. This approach to situation appeared
to offer a more detailed model than the one presented by Halliday, without,
however, indicating the ways in which situation could be reflected in
grammar.
1.1.3. Linguistic philosophy
A fundamental influence on the development of the functional-notional
approach was the British philosopher J. L. Austin and his work How to do
Things with Words (1962). Austin, starting from a division of utterances into
constatives (true or false statements) and performatives (utterances used to do
things), ended up with the claim that all utterances simultaneously perform
three kinds of acts: locutionary act (the propositional content), illocutionary
act (the conventional force of an utterance, e.g. statement, offer, promise) and
perlocutionary act (the effect of the utterance on the addressee). The most
important of these for Austin was the illocutionary act (or speech act), of which
Austin distinguished five general classes: verdictives (e.g. assess, estimate,
describe, analyse); exercitives (e.g. order, warn, urge, advise); commissives
(e.g. promise, intend, agree); behabitives (e.g. apologise, thank,
congratulate); and expositives (e.g. affirm, deny, state, conclude, define).
The best known treatment of speech acts after Austin was that of Searle
(1969). In discussing performatives, Austin had spoken of felicity conditions
which performatives must meet if they are to succeed. Searle suggested that
felicity conditions are jointly constitutive of speech acts, that is, they are rules
in accordance with which speech acts are created and comprehended. Felicity
conditions are of four types, depending on how they specify propositional
content, preparatory preconditions, sincerity conditions and the essential
condition, and can be used to compare different speech acts. Searle also offered
a classification of speech acts supposedly based on felicity conditions:
representatives (e.g. assert, conclude); directives (e.g. request, question);
commissives (e.g. promise, threaten, offer); expressives (e.g. apologize, thank,
congratulate); and declarations (e.g. excommunicate, declare war).