THE DIGITAL PANDEMIC4
which affects the scale, pace and pattern of human experience,
pertains more to imagination than to perception. That a certain
phenomenon is perceived as close or distant in space and time
tells us nothing about how it affects us from that proximity or
distance. That this same phenomenon can be recognized as more
or less threatening, more or less touching, more or less urgent,
is something that only the intervention of imagination, which
Kant famously called a ‘hidden art in the depths of the human
soul’,
5
can explain. What has changed, due to continual exposure
to and dependency on digital remediation, is precisely how this
intervention, whereby imagination predetermines the meaning of
proximity and distance, takes place. In the digital age, the sense of
proximity and distance slips out of its constraints. Fear, agitation,
yearning, impatience and hope are all felt differently. Their
meaning changes as the material and transcendental conditions of
their emergence mutate.
These changes implicate a variety of domains of human
life, in particular those whose logic depends for its emotional
and intellectual significance on the recognition of distance and
proximity. Among these domains are love, study, art, community
and travel. In fact, what are all of these if not instances of a dialectic
between moving closer and distancing – from the other (love), the
unknown (study), the enigmatic (art), the common (community)
and the remote (travel)? This list of domains is not meant to be
exhaustive or definitive. It is, however, illustrative of important
mutations that I am interested in mapping in the fields of ethics,
politics and culture.
*
The Digital Pandemic offers a distinctive approach to the Covid-19
crisis, examining its consequences in the light of the broader debate
about the digital revolution. Unlike many analyses of the pandemic –
including those by Giorgio Agamben, Slavoj Žižek, Bruno Latour
and Donatella Di Cesare – my approach is neither apocalyptic nor
prophetic.
6
Instead, avoiding the traps of futurology, and rather
than fearing or welcoming the impact of the pandemic based on
already established philosophical systems, it traces an alternative
path, seeking to create a chart for understanding both what the
pandemic reveals about the world and how it transforms the
conditions of human experience.