The Negotiation Process Four Stages {Lecture Notes}

fellowbuddy 8,229 views 23 slides Apr 25, 2016
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 23
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23

About This Presentation

FellowBuddy.com is an innovative platform that brings students together to share notes, exam papers, study guides, project reports and presentation for upcoming exams.
We connect Students who have an understanding of course material with Students who need help.
Benefits:-
# Students can catch up ...


Slide Content

The Negotiation Process:The Negotiation Process:
Four StagesFour Stages

A Key Concept for All A Key Concept for All
NegotiationsNegotiations
Negotiator and mediator Theodore Kheel Negotiator and mediator Theodore Kheel
summarized a critical concept:summarized a critical concept:
22

““Negotiations are about changing the Negotiations are about changing the
status quo. Unless both parties can status quo. Unless both parties can
receive something more than what the receive something more than what the
status quo provides, there is nothing for status quo provides, there is nothing for
them to negotiate.”them to negotiate.”

Why? If not, they will choose the status Why? If not, they will choose the status
quo and walk away.quo and walk away.
22 Theodore W. Kheel, Theodore W. Kheel, The Keys to Conflict ResolutionThe Keys to Conflict Resolution (New York, NY: Focus Walls Eight Windows, 1999). (New York, NY: Focus Walls Eight Windows, 1999).
2-2

Five Negotiation SkillsFive Negotiation Skills

Skill 2.1: Skill 2.1: PreparationPreparation before entering a before entering a
negotiation includes deciding a negotiation includes deciding a BATNABATNA

Skill 2.2: Consider appropriate Skill 2.2: Consider appropriate ground rulesground rules

Skill 2.3: Develop an Skill 2.3: Develop an initial offerinitial offer

Skill 2.4:Skill 2.4: Anticipate Anticipate posturingposturing

Skill 2.5Skill 2.5: : Decide if the negotiation is a Decide if the negotiation is a single single
issue or multiple issuesissue or multiple issues and if it includes and if it includes two two
or more partiesor more parties and the appropriate strategy. and the appropriate strategy.
Also decide if an Also decide if an impasse impasse occurs how it occurs how it
should be resolvedshould be resolved
2-3

The Four Stages:The Four Stages:

Stage 1: PreparationStage 1: Preparation

Stage 2: Opening Stage 2: Opening
Statements Statements

Stage 3: BargainingStage 3: Bargaining

Stage 4: SettlementStage 4: Settlement
Opening Statements
Bargaining
Preparation
Settlement
2-4

Historical Development of the Historical Development of the
Negotiation ProcessNegotiation Process

1930s-50s: “Hard bargaining,” threats, 1930s-50s: “Hard bargaining,” threats,
bluffs, little flexibilitybluffs, little flexibility

1980s: 1980s: Getting to Yes Getting to Yes introduced “win-introduced “win-
win” strategywin” strategy

1980s: Game Theory, Howard Raiffa’s 1980s: Game Theory, Howard Raiffa’s
The Art and Science of NegotiationThe Art and Science of Negotiation

1990s: Interest-based bargaining (IBB) 1990s: Interest-based bargaining (IBB)
problem-solving focusproblem-solving focus

Today: All these views have merged to Today: All these views have merged to
produce a new understanding of the produce a new understanding of the
negotiation processnegotiation process
2-5

Chapter Case: The Budget Chapter Case: The Budget
PresentationPresentation

Francis, a newly appointed dept. head, asked Francis, a newly appointed dept. head, asked
the head of another department to describe the the head of another department to describe the
budget process. She told him “it’s a vicious, budget process. She told him “it’s a vicious,
competitive process…we all know that we are competitive process…we all know that we are
fighting for a share of a fixed pool of funds” fighting for a share of a fixed pool of funds”

After the meeting you sit down with the CEO and After the meeting you sit down with the CEO and
try to get the most you can for your department, try to get the most you can for your department,
keeping in mind the presentation by the other keeping in mind the presentation by the other
dept. headsdept. heads

How does Francis prepare? Negotiate with the How does Francis prepare? Negotiate with the
CEO?CEO?
2-6

Stage 1: PreparationStage 1: Preparation

Decide your BATNA - Decide your BATNA - always start with a clearly always start with a clearly
defined BATNA and stick to itdefined BATNA and stick to it

List all key issuesList all key issues either party will want decided. either party will want decided.
Include tangibles, intangibles, throwaways…the more Include tangibles, intangibles, throwaways…the more
the better!the better!

Set prioritiesSet priorities for the key issues by either: 1. for the key issues by either: 1.
Ranking; 2. Weights (%); 3. Assign each issue to one Ranking; 2. Weights (%); 3. Assign each issue to one
of four priority levels—Essential, Important, of four priority levels—Essential, Important,
Desirable, ThrowawayDesirable, Throwaway

Develop support argumentsDevelop support arguments based on based on
information, facts, logicinformation, facts, logic
2-7

What Is What Is BATNABATNA??

BATNA = the BATNA = the BBest est AAlternative lternative TTo o
a a NNegotiated egotiated AAgreementgreement

Always decide your BATNA Always decide your BATNA
before entering any negotiation!before entering any negotiation!

BATNA = the value or point at BATNA = the value or point at
which you will choose no which you will choose no
agreement over a settlementagreement over a settlement

BATNA is similar to the “walk-BATNA is similar to the “walk-
away” value or pointaway” value or point
2-8

How to Determine Your How to Determine Your
BATNA!BATNA!
(Answer the following questions)(Answer the following questions)

If the other party withdrew from negotiations If the other party withdrew from negotiations
today, what are your alternatives?today, what are your alternatives?

Can you list and place an estimated value on all Can you list and place an estimated value on all
the economic variables such as price, timing, the economic variables such as price, timing,
warranty, options, etc.?warranty, options, etc.?

How important is your long-term relationship with How important is your long-term relationship with
the other party? Can you assign a dollar value to the other party? Can you assign a dollar value to
it? Does it override other factors?it? Does it override other factors?

Can you improve your BATNA by seeking new Can you improve your BATNA by seeking new
alternatives to no agreement?alternatives to no agreement?
2-9

Preparation Includes Preparation Includes
DevelopingDeveloping Support Support
ArgumentsArguments

FactsFacts

InformationInformation

LogicLogic

PersuasionPersuasion

Why? You attempt to “level the playing Why? You attempt to “level the playing
field” or perception of power/leveragefield” or perception of power/leverage
2-10

The Basic Stages of
Negotiation

Stage 2: Opening SessionStage 2: Opening Session

Ground Rules:Ground Rules: Consider the “5 Ws”Consider the “5 Ws”

Initial offersInitial offers on each issue of on each issue of
importance to either side are presentedimportance to either side are presented

PosturingPosturing to state one’s case, blow off to state one’s case, blow off
steam, etc., may include presenting steam, etc., may include presenting
conflicting views, concealing objectives, conflicting views, concealing objectives,
caucusing, inflexibility, unwillingness to caucusing, inflexibility, unwillingness to
compromisecompromise
2-12

Items Identified for Negotiations by a Husband
and Wife Building a New Home with a Limited
Upgrades Budget

Ground Rules: Consider “The 5 Ground Rules: Consider “The 5
Ws”Ws”

WWHOHO speaks for each party, is authorized to speaks for each party, is authorized to
make/reject offers, and how many people will be make/reject offers, and how many people will be
on each team?on each team?

WWHEREHERE will negotiation take place, and what will negotiation take place, and what
will be the seating arrangement?will be the seating arrangement?

WWHENHEN will negotiations begin, and how long will negotiations begin, and how long
will sessions last?will sessions last?

HOHOWW will offers be made, issues included in the will offers be made, issues included in the
discussion?discussion?

WWHATHAT form form of final agreement is acceptable of final agreement is acceptable
(handshake, verbal, written, notarized)?(handshake, verbal, written, notarized)?
2-14

Bargaining Styles: Howard Bargaining Styles: Howard
Raiffa’s FOTE & POTERaiffa’s FOTE & POTE

FOTE = Full, Open, Truthful Exchange, which FOTE = Full, Open, Truthful Exchange, which
includes a completely open, honest, and truthful includes a completely open, honest, and truthful
exchange of interests. FOTE is primarily only used exchange of interests. FOTE is primarily only used
by family, friends, long-time business associates, by family, friends, long-time business associates,
studentsstudents

POTE = Partial, Open, Truthful Exchange which POTE = Partial, Open, Truthful Exchange which
includes the concealment of real interests, includes the concealment of real interests,
posturing, bluffing, etc., and causes the parties to posturing, bluffing, etc., and causes the parties to
practice “the negotiation dance.” POTE is used by practice “the negotiation dance.” POTE is used by
most negotiatorsmost negotiators

Why is POTE used more? The parties lack the trust Why is POTE used more? The parties lack the trust
required to engage in FOTErequired to engage in FOTE
2-15

““Saving Face”Saving Face”

Both parties need to “save face” or avoid Both parties need to “save face” or avoid
embarrassment during and at the end of embarrassment during and at the end of
negotiationnegotiation

Both parties need some “gains” to tout, if not Both parties need some “gains” to tout, if not
why would they settle?why would they settle?

Neither party presents the final deal as a “win-Neither party presents the final deal as a “win-
lose” and could potentially cause hardship for lose” and could potentially cause hardship for
the other partythe other party

Why? Payback can be a powerful motivator! Why? Payback can be a powerful motivator!
Keep in mind future encountersKeep in mind future encounters
2-16

Stage 3: BargainingStage 3: Bargaining

Two critical variables shape the negotiation: Two critical variables shape the negotiation:
number of parties, number of issuesnumber of parties, number of issues

Two-party and single issue = “zero-sum” Two-party and single issue = “zero-sum”
(assuming no long-term relationship)(assuming no long-term relationship)

Two party and multiple issues = trades to Two party and multiple issues = trades to
achieve an efficient settlementachieve an efficient settlement

Three parties and one issue = auction Three parties and one issue = auction
processprocess

Three parties and multiple issues = Three parties and multiple issues =
consensus by all on some or all issuesconsensus by all on some or all issues
2-17

Common Bargaining Tactics Common Bargaining Tactics
to Prepare Forto Prepare For

Extreme (high or low) opening offersExtreme (high or low) opening offers

Claiming limited authorityClaiming limited authority

Emotional outburstsEmotional outbursts

Offering few concessionsOffering few concessions

Resisting deadlinesResisting deadlines
2-18

Possible Negotiation SituationsPossible Negotiation Situations
Number of IssuesTwo Three or More
One Zero-sum
Outcome
Auction Process
Multiple Efficient
Outcomes
Consensus by all
parties on all
issues, or only some
issues resolved by
some parties
following their
BATNAs
Number of Parties Involved
2-19

Stage 4: SettlementStage 4: Settlement

Negotiations result in either a settlement or an Negotiations result in either a settlement or an
impasse (stalemate)impasse (stalemate)

Impasse = both parties still seek an agreement Impasse = both parties still seek an agreement
but negotiations have stalledbut negotiations have stalled

Why do parties declare an impasse even though Why do parties declare an impasse even though
they both still seek a settlement? Common they both still seek a settlement? Common
reasons: (1) noncommunication of interests; (2) reasons: (1) noncommunication of interests; (2)
excessive emotional involvement; (3) failure of excessive emotional involvement; (3) failure of
one or both to realize the interests of the other one or both to realize the interests of the other
party and thus offer a settlement which exceeds party and thus offer a settlement which exceeds
their BATNA their BATNA
2-20

Beyond Impasse: Third-Party Beyond Impasse: Third-Party
InterventionsInterventions

FacilitationFacilitation --- known friend or family member --- known friend or family member
is trusted to provide assistance by meeting is trusted to provide assistance by meeting
separately with both parties and suggesting a separately with both parties and suggesting a
settlementsettlement

MediationMediation --- third party assists the parties in --- third party assists the parties in
the development of a mutually acceptable the development of a mutually acceptable
settlementsettlement

ArbitrationArbitration --- third party is empowered to --- third party is empowered to
make a “final and binding” decision on all make a “final and binding” decision on all
unresolved issuesunresolved issues
2-21

The ClosingThe Closing

With a verbal agreement (if between With a verbal agreement (if between
family members or friends); a handshake; family members or friends); a handshake;
or a written, signed, and dated document or a written, signed, and dated document
the negotiation endsthe negotiation ends

Both sides realize gains beyond their Both sides realize gains beyond their
walk-away point (BATNA)walk-away point (BATNA)
2-23