thematerialandeconomicself-230402092954-dfd17b04.pptx

JOHNARISQUIMPO1 83 views 26 slides Oct 12, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 26
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26

About This Presentation

Understanding the self - The Material/ Economic Self


Slide Content

Understanding the Self The Material and Economic Self GROUP 2

What is Materialistic or Economic Self?

William James

According to William James wrote in 1890 stated that “ A man’s self is the sum total of all that he can call his”.This included his body, family and reputation but also his “clothes and his house, his lands and horses, and yacht and bank account.” If they grew, their owner felt triumphant. If they faded, people felt a part of themselves was dying. (Trentman, 2016)

Think of your material self as that of what you are clothed of, what interests you or are passionate about, what you spend for. The material self craves for clothes not only to cover the essential parts of the body, but also to decorate the self. All the physical elements that reflect who a person is, maybe possessions, cars, home, body, clothes, are part of the material self.

Psychologist who study the impact of wealth and inequality on human behavior have found that money can powerfully influence our thoughts and actions in ways that we’re often not aware of, no matter what economic circumstances are (Greogoire, 2014) Curtis (2017) manifested that cash can have serious bearing on one’s belief regarding the way a person views himself/herself.

Evidences Behind the Idea that Money truly can Change People

A. SOCIAL AND BUSINESS VALUE Heyman and Ariely (2004) surmised that there are two motivations for completing a given task. The first is social. By recognizing a task’s social value, a person sees it as a worthy investment of time and part of his/her social duty, and he/she is usually happy to help out. When money is offered as the motivation, however, people then start thinking less of the social aspect and more about the business value.

B. SELF- SUFFICIENCY AND SERVICE Those who are conscious of money typically strive to be more self- sufficient than those for whom money isn’t a priority. When given a very difficult and even impossible task, with instructions that help was available, it was the money- related group that seemed the most intent on getting the job done alone, even it was not possible to finish the task solo.

It only means that money- conscious individuals are more self- sufficient than their peers, particularly when money is made the focus.

C. SELF- VIEW The amount one earns could have an effect on how he/she view both himself/herself and others. Class Essentialism - The idea that differences between classes are based upon identity and genetics ,rather than circumstance. Poor people tend to believe that social class was not related to genes, that essentially, anyone can be rich and anyone can be poor.

D. ETHICS OThose who perceive themselves to be in higher class where the most likely to engage in unethical behavior, particularly when a symbol of wealth was introduced, such as cutting off a pedestrian when a luxury car, for example. Piff in his study labeled the behavior, “self- interest maximization,” an idea that suggest those who have the most money or occupy higher classes are more likely to take a “what’s in it for me?” attitude. They actively work toward the most benefit for themselves (Piff, 2012).

E. ADDICTION The fact or condition of being addicted to a particular substance , thing, or activity. Many addictions begins because a person gets a positive response from a certain type of behavior.

A compulsive behavior nor motivated by dependency on an addictive substance, but rather by a process that leads to a seemingly positive outcome. This is called behavioral or process addiction.

POSSESSIONS AND THE EXTENDED SELF The premise that people regard their possessions are parts of themselves is not new. If possessions are viewed as part of self, it follows that an unintentional loss or lessening of self. One of the first steps in receiving new members into these institutions is to systematically deprive them of all personal possessions including clothing, money, and even names. Their bodies may be standardized to some degree, as with military haircuts, and their behaviors and conservations may be severely restricted.

They are reissued standard wardrobes and minimal possessions to aid in rebuilding a new standardized identity. Another instance in which no voluntary loss of possession may bring about a diminished sense of self is when possessions are lost due to theft or casualty. There is a connection between wealth and well being. A belief that feeds what JULIET SCHOR (1998) calls the “cycle of work and spend”- work more to buy more.

The level of consumption is set mainly by people’s choices about how much to work, and therefore how much income to earn. The individual chooses between hours at work (which yield income) and leisure ( a “good” in itself, but a costly one because it entails foregoing income).

SPECIAL CASES OF EXTERNAL SELF Collections ("I Shop, Therefore I am") Collections of this sort may be initiated by gifts or other unintended acquisitions, but the cultivation of a collection is a purposeful self- defining act. Mason (1981) Collecting has become a significant activity in our consumer society as it has become more widely affordable though the discretionary time and money available to the general population rather than just to the wealthy elite. Belk (1892) Humans and animals once primarily assembled collections of necessities for future security, but today humans more often assemble collections of non- necessities for distinction and self definition. Goldberg and Lewis (1978) "Many collectors who are inhibited and uncomfortable in social interaction, surround themselves with favored objects upon which they project human like qualities. They practically talk to these objects; they find comfort in being with them regard them as friends".

In these sense, collections may be seen as transition objects or security blankets for adults. To some extent, a compulsive tendency urges them the increasing desire to collect as much as they could which gives them a greater feeling of security, and therefore becoming a basis of the sense of self and identity.- "I shop, therefore I am; I have, therefore, I am"

Pets are regarded commonly as representative of self and studies show that we attempt to infer characteristics of people from their pets (Foote 1956; Heiman 1967) Others have observed that, like people, pets are regarded as family members (e.g., Cain 1985; Friedmann and Thomas 1985; Hickord and Schmitt 1982; Rochberg- Halton 1985; Wallendorfand Belk 1987). PETS AS EXTENDED SELF

In this regard, it is significant that we name our pets, feed and care for them, photograph them, spend money on them, and mourn their death ( Hickrod and Schmitt 1982; Meer 1984) Levinson (1972) and Robin Bensel (1985) found that pets are so instrumental to self- identity that they are often useful as transition objects (surrogate parents) for children and as surrogate children for adults.

BODY PARTS Body parts are among the most central parts of the extended self. In psychoanalytical terms, such self- extension is called cathexis. Cathexis involves the charging of an object, activity, or idea with emotional energy to the individual. The most commonly has been applied to body parts and it is known, for instance, the women generally tend to cathect body parts to a greater than men and that such cathexis reflects self- acceptance. When a body part is more highly cathected, there is greater use grooming products to care for this part of the body.

Csikszentimihalyi and Rochberg- Halton (1981) proposed the seemingly identical concept of psychic energy investment to describe the process of identification with possessions of any type. Since we are permanently attached to our body parts, these body parts are expected to be more strongly cathected than material possessions that can be more easily acquired and discarded. The material self refers to all of the physical elements that reflect who a person is which included his/her body, possessions and home. The body is the innermost part of the material. The family, home, and clothes also form a person’s material self. Furthermore, practical interest of a person is part of his/her material self which include the instinctive impluse of collecting proprerty.

Materialism refers to the theory or belief that nothing exist except matter, its movements and modifications; the theory or belief that consciousness and will are wholly due to material agency; a tendency to consider material possessions and physical comfort as more important than spiritual values.

A person is define not by what he thinks, but by what he owns. Shopping is an expressive and constitutive existential act. ( Kruger) Understanding shopping is important in determining race and culture , gender , class , family, and community. (Belk, 2016)

Thank you..