Understanding Media Literacy and Managing Misinformation (2024 edition)

mrdamian 66 views 97 slides Jun 28, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 97
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64
Slide 65
65
Slide 66
66
Slide 67
67
Slide 68
68
Slide 69
69
Slide 70
70
Slide 71
71
Slide 72
72
Slide 73
73
Slide 74
74
Slide 75
75
Slide 76
76
Slide 77
77
Slide 78
78
Slide 79
79
Slide 80
80
Slide 81
81
Slide 82
82
Slide 83
83
Slide 84
84
Slide 85
85
Slide 86
86
Slide 87
87
Slide 88
88
Slide 89
89
Slide 90
90
Slide 91
91
Slide 92
92
Slide 93
93
Slide 94
94
Slide 95
95
Slide 96
96
Slide 97
97

About This Presentation

Presentation delivered to Fulbright Scholars and Teaching Assistants focused on issues related to navigating misinformation and media literacy in Europe/Eurasia, with a special focus on media freedom, gatekeepers, as well as case studies and tips for managing misinformation.


Slide Content

Understanding Media Literacy
and Managing Misinformation
Damian Radcliffe, Chambers Professor of Journalism
University of Oregon
June 2024

Today’s session
1. Definitions
2. Spotlight on misinformation
3. Tips and Tools
4. Alumni experiences (panel)
5. Q&A with Panel

Virtual Introductions
Your nameWhere you’re
based now
Where you’re
heading to!

And who are you?
Who am I?

About Me
•British – in USA since 2015
•Married (Habiba)
•3 x Children (Nyla, Yara and Rafi)
•1 cat (Oreo)
•Love(d) to travel (58 countries)
•BA and MA Oxford University

1995 – 1999: The Local Radio Company
1999 – 2003: BBC
2003 – 2008: CSV Media (NGO)
2008 – 2012: Ofcom (UK Office of Communications)
2012 - 2014: ictQATAR (Ministry and Regulator)
2012 + Freelance journalist + trainer
2015 + University of Oregon
Background
1995 2024

Many hats
Carolyn S. Chambers Professor in Journalism
University of Oregon
Fellow, Tow Center for Digital Journalism
Columbia University, Graduate School of Journalism
Honorary Research Fellow
Cardiff University, School of Journalism, Media and Culture Studies
Life Fellow
Royal Society for the encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce (RSA)

Visiting Fellow
Oxford University
Spring + Summer 2024

Lens for this session…
• Journalist
• Researcher
• Educator and Trainer
Those hats…

Yes, we’re (second) cousins!

1. Definitions

“Media Literacy is the ability to
access, analyze, evaluate and
create media in a variety of forms.”
1992 Aspen Media Literacy Leadership Institute

“Media Literacy is a 21st century approach to education. It
provides a framework to access, analyze, evaluate, create
and participate with messages in a variety of forms — from
print to video to the Internet.
Media literacy builds an understanding of the role of media
in society as well as essential skills of inquiry and self-
expression necessary for citizens of a democracy.”
Center for Media Literacy

Tl;DR > Multiple definitions, but typically include:
-Access – media plurality (e.g., FB = internet), affordability, freedom of information
-Understanding - critical thinking + how media works
-Ability to manage risks and potential harms

2. Spotlight on misinformation

What do we mean by
misinformation?

Global Issue Across all markets,
respondents worried
about what is real and
what is fake on the
internet overall is up
3pp from 56% to 59%.
Highest in some
countries going to the
polls this year, incl.
South Africa (81%), the
United States (72%),
and the UK (70%).
Highest levels of
concern in Africa (75%)
and lower levels in
much of Northern and
Western Europe.

Typology

How it works

Motive Matters

How confident are you?
Post in the chat:
1-3 = Not very confident
4-6 = Somewhat confident
7-9 = Very confident
10 = I should be giving this talk, Damian!

Resilience to ”Fake News” Open Society Institute (2021)
Factors used to create
this index included:
-Press Freedom
-Multiple literacy levels
(e.g. maths, science,)
-Education levels
-Trust in others

Latest data
“Some of the most vulnerable countries as
registered by low results in the Media Literacy
Index 2023 are also the closest to the war in
Ukraine started by Russia and among the most
exposed to malign disinformation.
In a similar vein, the Balkan countries, many of
which are still experiencing internal instability
and inter-state tensions in 2023, remain among
the highest at-risk countries in the index.”

5 x Examples

Footage shown of President
Zelensky “out there fighting for
his country,” was filmed in 2021.
(Screenshot via NewsGuard)
1. False context

Game footage also used to depict
war in Ukraine… and Syria…

2. Poor and/or partisan journalism

And perceptions of it

3. Fake websites

4. Conspiracy theories

Covered by:
- Quartz
- Elite Daily
- Cosmopolitan
- BuzzFeed
- Digg
- MTV
- And more!
5. Humor – Parody - Satire

Denial covered by Quartz, Washington Post + others.

What examples have you seen?

Why now? 10x key factors

1. Fake news looks a lot like real news

2. Tech doesn’t discern fact from fiction

Makes it very easy to share…
“False information spreads just
like accurate information.”
Farida Vis, Sheffield University research fellow

AND…
They have cut back on a
lot of fact-checking.
Don’t check political ads.
Reinstated accounts e.g.
Trump, Kennedy et al.

“Social media platforms’
insufficient protections—
coupled with a surge in
political marketing and the
changing nature of news—
will exacerbate an already
fraught environment and
pose major brand safety
problems.”
eMarketer on UNESCO AND Ipsos data

3. Algorithms can create filter bubbles…
They show us more of what we like, not what we need to know

4. Decline in the number
of journalists

5. And reduced
trust in media
and journalism

Global Issue
Backdrop of declining trust in Institutions, more partisan societies…

6. Misinformation evolving into
different forms + different platforms

Claims can be more powerful – and memorable
when there’s an image associated with it

Memes

7. Harder
than ever
to discern
fact from
fiction

8. New tools… powerful Generative AI

Stone Age Selfie

AI-generated image
used by Amnesty
International to
illustrate police
brutality.
Source: The
Guardian

Body of a
massive
octopus
washed up
on the coast
of Indonesia

“Some of the most compelling AI image tools look a
little cinematic, a little too polished… They tend to
look a bit softer — with an almost airbrushed quality.”
"Other giveaways are unrealistic or nonsensical
backgrounds, and bizarre, missing or misshapen
minor details,"
Peter Adams, senior vice president of research
and design with the News Literacy Project

9. Bots + weaponization of the web

“In place of overt, mass repression, rulers
such as Vladimir Putin, Recep Tayyip
Erdogan, and Viktor Orbán control their
citizens by distorting information and
simulating democratic procedures. Like
spin doctors in democracies, they spin
the news to engineer support.”
How a new breed of dictators holds
power by manipulating information
and faking democracy

Media Capture
“In many parts of the world, special interests, from oligarchs and other
elites to governments, are influencing and controlling the media for
personal gain.
When media is captured in this way, it is no longer independent.
Captured media loses the ability to reflect the broad interests of the
community and to hold power to account – the classic role of the fourth
estate. Most often, media is captured by governments, plutocrats or
corporations or, in many cases, a mixture of all three.”
Internews, 2017

10. Reduced – and declining media freedom

Q: How does
your country
rank?

Types of electoral mis- and disinformation
LatamChequeacoalition —a network of Latin American, Spanish, Portuguese and U.S. fact-checkers fighting
Spanish-language disinformationdiscovered 10 types of disinformation repeated in electoral cycles over the
last three years in every country they researched in Latin America, as well as in the 2020 U.S. elections.
Unintentional Irregularities denounced as fraud Disinformation about the documentation
needed to vote
Alleged fraud coordinated by authoritiesDisinformation about citizens voting abroad
Votes cast in the name of deceased personsChaos on election day
People are voting who are not qualified to do soFalse polls
Manipulation to discourage votingFabricated candidate statements

Q: Who should be
responsible for
addressing this?
How do we fix this?

A multi-stakeholder approach
•Government
•Regulators
•Tech Companies
•Journalists and Fact Checkers
•Consumers
•Education System

3. Tips and Tools
- 10 recommendations

1.Consume widely…
+ develop a list of trust sources

2. Understand your source

3. Double check everything

4. Be skeptical

5. Learn to reverse image search

6. Slow Down

Misinformation can have major consequences

7. Be mindful as stories break

And where…

8. Check your emotions

The biggest red flag for me is when something evokes
an emotion in you. That doesn’t necessarily mean that
it’s misinformation, but it signals that somebody’s
trying to manipulate your emotions, and that’s
something you should be aware of. When you
recognize it, remember to take a deep breath and
look into it a little bit before you believe it.
Leticia Bode, professor of Communication,
Culture and Technology, Georgetown University

9. Find the
local
equivalent
of Snopes,
PolitiFact
etc.

Also being
weaponized

10. Don’t
automatically trust
authority figures

"Nothing we have seen in the
image seems like particularly
malicious edits. Clearly, not
much time was put into the
edits as you can see the clear
traces left behind."
Cole Whitecotton, senior
professional research
assistant for the National
Center for Media Forensics at
the University of Colorado,
Denver.

Yes, we’re (second) cousins!

Yes, we’re cousins!

Email: [email protected]
X/Twitter: @damianradcliffe
Web: www.damianradcliffe.com
Thanks for listening